-
Sign Up
-
Recent Posts
- Lindsay Clancy – why the 11 jurors were right to vote not guilty; a psychiatrist explains September 20, 2026
- A valuable task for AI: assist the Bell Royal Commission September 19, 2026
- Illigrants are thieves, not asylum seekers September 18, 2026
- Free us from “free Palestine”, begs Brendan O’Neill September 17, 2026
- Giggle v Tickle: High Court leave to appeal declined on procedural grounds September 14, 2026
Recent Comments
Author Archives: andrew
Lindsay Clancy – why the 11 jurors were right to vote not guilty; a psychiatrist explains
Arguably the most hotly debated result in a murder trial anywhere in the world, the Lindsay Clancy case pits angry mobs calling for her guilt against those who agree with DR SALLY SATEL, a psychiatrist and lecturer at the Yale … Continue reading
Posted in Democracy and Justice
Leave a comment
A valuable task for AI: assist the Bell Royal Commission
Andrew L. Urban. With just two months before the Bell Royal Commissioner is due to deliver her final report and recommendations to the Governor General, the Commission has a mountain of more than 20,000 submissions to absorb & analyse (including … Continue reading
Posted in Democracy And Terrorism
Leave a comment
Illigrants are thieves, not asylum seekers
Andrew L. Urban. Australia and America (like Hungary) have effectively closed their borders to illegal migrants; Britain has not. Illigrants, as I like to call them, cause massive socio-economic disruptions under the sympathy-draining label ‘asylum seekers’. They are not. They … Continue reading
Posted in Democracy And Refugees
Leave a comment
Free us from “free Palestine”, begs Brendan O’Neill
Andrew L. Urban. Apart from agreeing with him, I was struck by the colourful writing in a column by Brendan O’Neill, chief political writer for Spiked, published in The Australian (Sept. 17, 2026). He abhors “insufferable Gazaholics”, “zombie hordes of … Continue reading
Posted in Democracy And Terrorism
Leave a comment
Giggle v Tickle: High Court leave to appeal declined on procedural grounds
Referring to the Federal Court’s decision to dismiss Grover/Giggle’s appeal in May 2026, the High Court has reasoned that “There is no reason to doubt the Full Court’s construction” of ss 7D(1) and (2), and an appeal dependent on demonstrating … Continue reading
Posted in Democracy and Justice
Leave a comment
Islam’s evil not just on 9/11
Andrew L. Urban. What with July 7*, October 7 and December 14 marked as dark days in the calendar, we don’t need the 25th anniversary of 9/11 as the Americans have it, to raise our consciousness about the implacable evil … Continue reading
Posted in Democracy And Terrorism
Leave a comment
Hastie & Pickering
The leading article in this week’s Spectator Australia is a welcome and detailed examination of the clash between Liberal Senator Andrew Hastie and Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party – with a side-serve of Warren Pickering. It’s so clear – and … Continue reading
Posted in Further reading
Leave a comment
Alborithms to the rescue?
Andrew L. Urban. The Labor government’s proposed Digital Duty of Care laws are in reality intended to override algorithms with Alborithms, algorithms operating under the authority, assumptions and ideological preferences of regulators and governments. Voters have a ‘duty to care’ … Continue reading
The Aussie flag: a burning issue
Andrew L. Urban. Burning the flag is not free speech, it’s hate speech. That statement reflects both sides of the argument about criminalising flag burning, as proposed policy by Liberal Leader Angus Taylor. And in this case, both sides can … Continue reading
Posted in By The Way
1 Comment
What Bell Royal Commission must do, for starters
Andrew L. Urban. As the Bell Royal Commission closes down taking incoming fire over its ultimately limp, incomplete approach to its task of exploring how Australia could so quickly be so rocked by antisemitism, perhaps we can help …
Posted in Democracy And Terrorism
Leave a comment